HyperGPT vs Artificial Superintelligence Alliance

Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) is 307.4× the size of HyperGPT (HGPT) by market capitalisation. Over the past 1 year, FET is ahead by 62.1 percentage points (HGPT -87.7% against FET -25.6%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.46 across 373 shared trading days). FET has been the more volatile of the two, at 118% annualised against HGPT's 102%.

Correlation: 0.46
Size ratio: 1 : 307.4
Ahead over 1 year: FET

HyperGPTHGPT

$0.001355

24h: -0.23%
Market cap: $1.22M
Volume 24h: $140,591
Volatility (ann.): 102%

Artificial Superintelligence AllianceFET

$0.163400

24h: +4.61%
Market cap: $375.80M
Volume 24h: $67.32M
Volatility (ann.): 118%

HGPT 0.3%Share of the two combined market caps99.7% FET

Performance

HGPTFET

7 days-4.90%-14.70%HGPT
30 days-30.89%-38.56%HGPT
90 days+4.08%+9.58%FET
1 year-87.71%-25.63%FET

Correlation

0.46over 373 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.7090d: 0.521y: 0.46

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	HGPT	FET
Max drawdown (400d)	-91.1%	-80.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.04	0.09
Best 30 days (past year)	+95.7%	+77.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	-56.3%	-49.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: HGPT outperformed FET by 8.6% — measured on the HGPT/FET ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

HyperGPT →Artificial Superintelligence Alliance →