BTC$76,046.00▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.84▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.27▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.43▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,234.58▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.31▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1831▼ 6.72%BCH$274.50▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1539▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.19▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9987▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8525▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,087.79▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.00▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,046.00▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.84▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.27▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.43▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,234.58▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.31▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1831▼ 6.72%BCH$274.50▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1539▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.19▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9987▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8525▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,087.79▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.00▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

$HYPERSKIDS vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 2158.0× the size of $HYPERSKIDS (HYPERSKIDS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.05 across 35 shared trading days). HYPERSKIDS has been the more volatile of the two, at 211% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
-0.05
Size ratio
1 : 2158.0
$HYPERSKIDSHYPERSKIDS

$7.573e-5

24h
+10.88%
Market cap
$75,720
Volume 24h
$338
Volatility (ann.)
211%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.163700

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
HYPERSKIDS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

HYPERSKIDSWIF

  1. 7 days-13.22%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days+1.94%-32.13%HYPERSKIDS
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.05over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricHYPERSKIDSWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-21.0%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.110.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: HYPERSKIDS outperformed WIF by 80.9% — measured on the HYPERSKIDS/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.