iFARM (IFARM) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.36 across 31 shared trading days). IFARM has been the more volatile of the two, at 120% annualised against BNB's 51%.
IFARMBNB
0.36over 31 shared trading days
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
| Metric | IFARM | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -21.4% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.15 | 0.45 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: IFARM outperformed BNB by 15.3% — measured on the IFARM/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.