BTC$76,221.00▼ 5.68%ETH$2,241.40▼ 7.74%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.03%BNB$694.30▼ 3.50%XRP$1.22▼ 6.89%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.29▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3188▼ 0.41%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.28%ZEC$1,313.48▲ 0.76%HYPE$77.76▼ 7.62%XMR$118.70▼ 2.83%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.53%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$73.04▼ 6.31%LEO$9.35▼ 0.09%LINK$10.86▼ 5.10%ADA$0.1851▼ 6.29%BCH$275.60▼ 2.79%XLM$0.1549▼ 8.05%NEAR$3.73▼ 7.28%USDE$1.00▼ 0.07%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006213▲ 3.74%UNI$6.97▼ 9.24%LTC$52.41▼ 6.99%CC$0.0955▼ 4.62%AVAX$8.28▼ 5.49%USD1$0.9996▼ 0.01%SUI$0.8614▼ 7.64%XAUT$4,054.79▼ 1.13%GRAM$1.11▼ 5.36%HBAR$0.0686▼ 5.69%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%QNT$191.41▼ 5.98%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.28%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$220.40▼ 6.81%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.96%BTC$76,221.00▼ 5.68%ETH$2,241.40▼ 7.74%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.03%BNB$694.30▼ 3.50%XRP$1.22▼ 6.89%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.29▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3188▼ 0.41%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 1.28%ZEC$1,313.48▲ 0.76%HYPE$77.76▼ 7.62%XMR$118.70▼ 2.83%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.53%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$73.04▼ 6.31%LEO$9.35▼ 0.09%LINK$10.86▼ 5.10%ADA$0.1851▼ 6.29%BCH$275.60▼ 2.79%XLM$0.1549▼ 8.05%NEAR$3.73▼ 7.28%USDE$1.00▼ 0.07%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006213▲ 3.74%UNI$6.97▼ 9.24%LTC$52.41▼ 6.99%CC$0.0955▼ 4.62%AVAX$8.28▼ 5.49%USD1$0.9996▼ 0.01%SUI$0.8614▼ 7.64%XAUT$4,054.79▼ 1.13%GRAM$1.11▼ 5.36%HBAR$0.0686▼ 5.69%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%QNT$191.41▼ 5.98%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.28%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$220.40▼ 6.81%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.96%

INMU vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 7886.5× the size of INMU (INMU) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.39 across 36 shared trading days). INMU has been the more volatile of the two, at 164% annualised against WIF's 105%.

Correlation
0.39
Size ratio
1 : 7886.5
INMUINMU

$2.153e-5

24h
+9.81%
Market cap
$20,773
Volume 24h
$632
Volatility (ann.)
164%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.164400

24h
-4.34%
Market cap
$163.83M
Volume 24h
$31.95M
Volatility (ann.)
105%
INMU 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

INMUWIF

  1. 7 days-8.81%-2.82%WIF
  2. 30 days-38.02%-34.09%WIF
  3. 90 days—+17.59%—
  4. 1 year—-62.97%—

Correlation

0.39over 36 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricINMUWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-54.2%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.280.17
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed INMU by 17.3% — measured on the INMU/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.