Inverse Cramer vs FLOAT
Inverse Cramer (REMARC) and FLOAT (FLOAT) compared side by side. FLOAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 2418065% annualised against REMARC's 1443%.
Inverse Cramer (REMARC) and FLOAT (FLOAT) compared side by side. FLOAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 2418065% annualised against REMARC's 1443%.
REMARCFLOAT
| Metric | REMARC | FLOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -81.6% | -100.0% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.04 | 0.15 |
Relative strength over 90 days: FLOAT outperformed REMARC by 100.0% — measured on the REMARC/FLOAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.