BTC$76,046.00▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.84▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.27▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.43▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,234.58▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.31▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1831▼ 6.72%BCH$274.50▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1539▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.19▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9987▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8525▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,087.79▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.00▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,046.00▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.84▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.27▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.43▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,234.58▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.31▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1831▼ 6.72%BCH$274.50▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1539▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.19▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9987▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8525▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,087.79▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.00▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

IS THIS NOT INSANE? vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 39001.6× the size of IS THIS NOT INSANE? (HELLO?) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.47 across 34 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against HELLO?'s 51%.

Correlation
0.47
Size ratio
1 : 39001.6
IS THIS NOT INSANE?HELLO?

$4.200e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$4,190
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
51%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.163700

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
HELLO? 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

HELLO?WIF

  1. 7 days-9.01%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-33.59%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.47over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricHELLO?WIF
Max drawdown (400d)-36.2%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.630.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed HELLO? by 0.9% — measured on the HELLO?/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.