BTC$77,925.72▼ 1.36%ETH$2,332.78▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$700.80▼ 1.07%XRP$1.28▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$92.63▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3179▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,263.27▼ 4.13%HYPE$80.41▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0741▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$11.12▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1894▼ 2.87%BCH$283.70▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1601▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.85▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$7.15▼ 5.21%LTC$54.02▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.51▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8828▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,097.48▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.12▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0697▼ 4.25%QNT$199.21▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$225.30▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%BTC$77,925.72▼ 1.36%ETH$2,332.78▼ 1.52%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.05%BNB$700.80▼ 1.07%XRP$1.28▼ 2.69%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$92.63▼ 2.40%TRX$0.3179▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.33%ZEC$1,263.27▼ 4.13%HYPE$80.41▼ 6.74%XMR$118.70▼ 2.32%DOGE$0.0741▼ 3.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$75.34▼ 1.21%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$11.12▼ 3.54%ADA$0.1894▼ 2.87%BCH$283.70▲ 1.14%XLM$0.1601▼ 4.20%NEAR$3.85▼ 7.15%DAI$1.00▲ 0.04%USDE$0.9998▲ 0.01%UNI$7.15▼ 5.21%LTC$54.02▼ 3.29%RAIN$0.005835▼ 4.73%CC$0.0964▼ 2.88%AVAX$8.51▼ 3.89%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.06%SUI$0.8828▼ 4.99%XAUT$4,097.48▲ 1.62%GRAM$1.12▼ 6.14%HBAR$0.0697▼ 4.25%QNT$199.21▼ 3.16%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▼ 2.14%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$225.30▼ 3.81%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0501▼ 2.59%

ItForTheBiscuit vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 25978.6× the size of ItForTheBiscuit (RISK) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.49 across 33 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against RISK's 55%.

Correlation
0.49
Size ratio
1 : 25978.6
ItForTheBiscuitRISK

$7.010e-6

24h
+4.02%
Market cap
$6,448
Volume 24h
$74
Volatility (ann.)
55%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.168100

24h
-4.99%
Market cap
$167.51M
Volume 24h
$28.65M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
RISK 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

RISKWIF

  1. 7 days-6.38%-7.39%RISK
  2. 30 days-24.48%-32.13%RISK
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.49over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricRISKWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-26.8%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.390.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: RISK outperformed WIF by 14.6% — measured on the RISK/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.