KelVPN vs Sentinel

KelVPN (KEL) and Sentinel (P2P) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, P2P is ahead by 64.6 percentage points (KEL -2.4% against P2P +62.2%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.17 across 27 shared trading days). KEL has been the more volatile of the two, at 171% annualised against P2P's 135%.

Correlation: -0.17
Ahead over 30 days: P2P

KelVPNKEL

$0.000985

24h: -1.08%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $731
Volatility (ann.): 171%

SentinelP2P

$4.567e-5

24h: +6.29%
Market cap: $1.64M
Volume 24h: $83,369
Volatility (ann.): 135%

KEL 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% P2P

Performance

KELP2P

7 days+14.72%+19.60%P2P
30 days-2.35%+62.22%P2P

Correlation

-0.17over 27 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	KEL	P2P
Max drawdown (400d)	-36.4%	-16.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.01	0.46

Relative strength over 90 days: P2P outperformed KEL by 51.7% — measured on the KEL/P2P ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

KelVPN →Sentinel →