BTC$79,762.01▲ 1.74%ETH$2,388.56▲ 3.10%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$711.99▲ 1.59%XRP$1.31▲ 1.98%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.45▲ 2.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.29%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,314.69▲ 1.92%HYPE$81.79▼ 3.27%XMR$118.70▼ 0.73%DOGE$0.0760▲ 1.56%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$76.97▲ 2.27%LINK$11.44▲ 2.46%LEO$9.35▲ 0.27%ADA$0.1944▲ 2.54%XLM$0.1641▲ 0.88%BCH$289.10▲ 5.13%NEAR$3.96▼ 1.92%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.01%UNI$7.31▼ 0.28%LTC$55.14▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.005875▼ 2.47%CC$0.1002▲ 2.71%AVAX$8.69▼ 0.06%SUI$0.9120▲ 0.92%USD1$0.9993▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,111.82▲ 1.86%GRAM$1.15▼ 2.31%HBAR$0.0714▲ 1.55%QNT$202.29▲ 1.53%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.78%TAO$232.20▲ 1.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0515▲ 1.41%BTC$79,762.01▲ 1.74%ETH$2,388.56▲ 3.10%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$711.99▲ 1.59%XRP$1.31▲ 1.98%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.45▲ 2.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.29%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,314.69▲ 1.92%HYPE$81.79▼ 3.27%XMR$118.70▼ 0.73%DOGE$0.0760▲ 1.56%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$76.97▲ 2.27%LINK$11.44▲ 2.46%LEO$9.35▲ 0.27%ADA$0.1944▲ 2.54%XLM$0.1641▲ 0.88%BCH$289.10▲ 5.13%NEAR$3.96▼ 1.92%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.01%UNI$7.31▼ 0.28%LTC$55.14▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.005875▼ 2.47%CC$0.1002▲ 2.71%AVAX$8.69▼ 0.06%SUI$0.9120▲ 0.92%USD1$0.9993▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,111.82▲ 1.86%GRAM$1.15▼ 2.31%HBAR$0.0714▲ 1.55%QNT$202.29▲ 1.53%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.78%TAO$232.20▲ 1.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0515▲ 1.41%

King Bonk vs Shiba Inu

Shiba Inu (SHIB) is 32805.4× the size of King Bonk (KINGBONK) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.35 across 28 shared trading days). SHIB has been the more volatile of the two, at 69% annualised against KINGBONK's 29%.

Correlation
0.35
Size ratio
1 : 32805.4
King BonkKINGBONK

$2.027e-13

24h
—
Market cap
$85,119
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
29%
Shiba InuSHIB

$4.730e-6

24h
+1.78%
Market cap
$2.79B
Volume 24h
$56.83M
Volatility (ann.)
69%
KINGBONK 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% SHIB

Performance

KINGBONKSHIB

  1. 7 days-3.05%-4.83%KINGBONK
  2. 30 days-8.21%-19.56%KINGBONK
  3. 90 days—+1.07%—
  4. 1 year—-46.55%—

Correlation

0.35over 28 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricKINGBONKSHIB
Max drawdown (400d)-11.7%-68.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.290.01
Best 30 days (past year)—+39.1%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-38.4%

Relative strength over 90 days: KINGBONK outperformed SHIB by 16.3% — measured on the KINGBONK/SHIB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.