kms vs Bordrless

kms (KMS) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, KMS is ahead by 48.2 percentage points (KMS -51.3% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.11 across 35 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against KMS's 671%.

Correlation: -0.11
Ahead over 30 days: KMS

kmsKMS

$2.347e-5

24h: -14.91%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $11,859
Volatility (ann.): 671%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

KMS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

KMSBORDR

7 days-25.66%-10.80%BORDR
30 days-51.28%-99.45%KMS

Correlation

-0.11over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	KMS	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-81.0%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.09	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: KMS outperformed BORDR by 1391.1% — measured on the KMS/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

kms →Bordrless →