Kuma Inu vs Bitway

Bitway (BTW) is 3473.2× the size of Kuma Inu (KUMA) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, BTW is ahead by 89.2 percentage points (KUMA -15.9% against BTW +73.4%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.21 across 23 shared trading days). BTW has been the more volatile of the two, at 365% annualised against KUMA's 35%.

Correlation: 0.21
Size ratio: 1 : 3473.2
Ahead over 30 days: BTW

Kuma InuKUMA

$1.190e-9

24h: +0.96%
Market cap: $495,856
Volume 24h: $27
Volatility (ann.): 35%

BitwayBTW

$1.1400

24h: +16.08%
Market cap: $1.72B
Volume 24h: $6.48M
Volatility (ann.): 365%

KUMA 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BTW

Performance

KUMABTW

7 days-2.60%-44.93%KUMA
30 days-15.87%+73.36%BTW

Correlation

0.21over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	KUMA	BTW
Max drawdown (400d)	-17.9%	-60.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.45	0.43

Relative strength over 90 days: KUMA outperformed BTW by 62.9% — measured on the KUMA/BTW ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Kuma Inu →Bitway →