老吴 (Lao Wu) vs Cash Cat

Cash Cat (CASHCAT) is 2856.1× the size of 老吴 (Lao Wu) (老吴) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, 老吴 is ahead by 18.7 percentage points (老吴 -18.0% against CASHCAT -36.7%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.21 across 23 shared trading days). CASHCAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 261% annualised against 老吴's 167%.

Correlation: 0.21
Size ratio: 1 : 2856.1
Ahead over 30 days: 老吴

老吴 (Lao Wu)老吴

$3.172e-5

24h: +4.06%
Market cap: $31,719
Volume 24h: $1,357
Volatility (ann.): 167%

Cash CatCASHCAT

$0.091720

24h: -16.16%
Market cap: $90.59M
Volume 24h: $12.72M
Volatility (ann.): 261%

老吴 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% CASHCAT

Performance

老吴CASHCAT

7 days-14.47%+3.53%CASHCAT
30 days-17.99%-36.68%老吴

Correlation

0.21over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	老吴	CASHCAT
Max drawdown (400d)	-43.1%	-69.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.22	-0.03

Relative strength over 90 days: CASHCAT outperformed 老吴 by 3.0% — measured on the 老吴/CASHCAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

老吴 (Lao Wu) →Cash Cat →