BTC$80,406.00▲ 3.48%ETH$2,419.71▲ 5.57%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$712.74▲ 2.21%XRP$1.31▲ 2.41%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.70▲ 3.33%TRX$0.3198▼ 0.45%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,312.70▲ 5.43%HYPE$83.25▼ 1.47%DOGE$0.0764▲ 2.45%XMR$118.70▲ 0.33%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.77▲ 4.13%LINK$11.49▲ 4.56%LEO$9.35▲ 0.56%ADA$0.1964▲ 3.40%XLM$0.1665▲ 2.40%BCH$280.50▲ 2.84%NEAR$4.00▲ 2.98%UNI$7.55▲ 3.79%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.67▲ 2.99%RAIN$0.005916▼ 5.35%CC$0.1040▲ 6.65%AVAX$8.72▲ 2.05%SUI$0.9209▲ 3.40%USD1$0.9991▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.16▼ 0.87%XAUT$4,095.18▲ 2.70%HBAR$0.0724▲ 4.25%QNT$204.12▲ 5.08%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.63%TAO$232.90▲ 2.80%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0520▲ 3.26%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,406.00▲ 3.48%ETH$2,419.71▲ 5.57%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$712.74▲ 2.21%XRP$1.31▲ 2.41%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.70▲ 3.33%TRX$0.3198▼ 0.45%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,312.70▲ 5.43%HYPE$83.25▼ 1.47%DOGE$0.0764▲ 2.45%XMR$118.70▲ 0.33%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.77▲ 4.13%LINK$11.49▲ 4.56%LEO$9.35▲ 0.56%ADA$0.1964▲ 3.40%XLM$0.1665▲ 2.40%BCH$280.50▲ 2.84%NEAR$4.00▲ 2.98%UNI$7.55▲ 3.79%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.67▲ 2.99%RAIN$0.005916▼ 5.35%CC$0.1040▲ 6.65%AVAX$8.72▲ 2.05%SUI$0.9209▲ 3.40%USD1$0.9991▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.16▼ 0.87%XAUT$4,095.18▲ 2.70%HBAR$0.0724▲ 4.25%QNT$204.12▲ 5.08%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.63%TAO$232.90▲ 2.80%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0520▲ 3.26%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

LC SHIB vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 326.1× the size of LC SHIB (LC) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.14 across 39 shared trading days). LC has been the more volatile of the two, at 136% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.14
Size ratio
1 : 326.1
LC SHIBLC

$0.000525

24h
+13.80%
Market cap
$523,541
Volume 24h
$19,914
Volatility (ann.)
136%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.171100

24h
-1.37%
Market cap
$170.72M
Volume 24h
$30.48M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
LC 0.3%Share of the two combined market caps99.7% WIF

Performance

LCWIF

  1. 7 days-7.67%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days+14.21%-32.13%LC
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.14over 39 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricLCWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-28.3%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.030.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: LC outperformed WIF by 9.2% — measured on the LC/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.