BTC$80,283.31▲ 2.37%ETH$2,416.90▲ 3.96%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.06%BNB$716.21▲ 1.97%XRP$1.32▲ 2.04%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.65▲ 3.54%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.81%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.55%ZEC$1,321.00▲ 0.54%HYPE$82.44▼ 4.57%DOGE$0.0769▲ 2.37%XMR$118.70▲ 0.39%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$77.66▲ 2.97%LINK$11.54▲ 3.31%LEO$9.35▲ 0.35%ADA$0.1981▲ 3.56%XLM$0.1661▲ 1.03%BCH$287.60▲ 4.08%NEAR$4.01▼ 1.51%UNI$7.47▲ 0.72%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.08%RAIN$0.006213▼ 0.25%LTC$55.79▲ 1.95%CC$0.1014▲ 2.95%AVAX$8.77▲ 0.98%SUI$0.9238▲ 1.27%USD1$0.9990▲ 0.00%XAUT$4,110.33▲ 1.95%GRAM$1.16▼ 2.69%HBAR$0.0721▲ 2.39%QNT$203.69▲ 2.07%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.20%TAO$234.00▲ 1.63%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0523▲ 2.18%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%BTC$80,283.31▲ 2.37%ETH$2,416.90▲ 3.96%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.06%BNB$716.21▲ 1.97%XRP$1.32▲ 2.04%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.65▲ 3.54%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.81%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.55%ZEC$1,321.00▲ 0.54%HYPE$82.44▼ 4.57%DOGE$0.0769▲ 2.37%XMR$118.70▲ 0.39%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$77.66▲ 2.97%LINK$11.54▲ 3.31%LEO$9.35▲ 0.35%ADA$0.1981▲ 3.56%XLM$0.1661▲ 1.03%BCH$287.60▲ 4.08%NEAR$4.01▼ 1.51%UNI$7.47▲ 0.72%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.08%RAIN$0.006213▼ 0.25%LTC$55.79▲ 1.95%CC$0.1014▲ 2.95%AVAX$8.77▲ 0.98%SUI$0.9238▲ 1.27%USD1$0.9990▲ 0.00%XAUT$4,110.33▲ 1.95%GRAM$1.16▼ 2.69%HBAR$0.0721▲ 2.39%QNT$203.69▲ 2.07%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.20%TAO$234.00▲ 1.63%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0523▲ 2.18%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%

Let's BONK vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 787.4× the size of Let's BONK (LETSBONK) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.67 across 39 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 110% annualised.

Correlation
0.67
Size ratio
1 : 787.4
Let's BONKLETSBONK

$0.003128

24h
+4.03%
Market cap
$217,845
Volume 24h
$34,149
Volatility (ann.)
116%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.171700

24h
-2.68%
Market cap
$171.53M
Volume 24h
$28.99M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
LETSBONK 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% WIF

Performance

LETSBONKWIF

  1. 7 days-8.02%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-37.16%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.67over 39 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricLETSBONKWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-40.4%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.290.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed LETSBONK by 24.7% — measured on the LETSBONK/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.