Lil' Shrub vs BNB
BNB (BNB) is 639924.7× the size of Lil' Shrub (SHRUB) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.05 across 30 shared trading days). SHRUB has been the more volatile of the two, at 181733% annualised against BNB's 51%.
Performance
| Period | SHRUB | BNB | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | +87.28% | +0.25% | SHRUB |
| 30 days | -35.56% | +11.26% | BNB |
| 90 days | — | +37.63% | — |
| 1 year | — | -23.72% | — |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | SHRUB | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -100.0% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed SHRUB by 43.1% — measured on the SHRUB/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
-0.05over 30 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.