LILMET vs Bordrless

LILMET (LILMET) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, LILMET is ahead by 41.4 percentage points (LILMET -58.0% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.02 across 20 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 888% annualised.

Correlation: -0.02
Ahead over 30 days: LILMET

LILMETLILMET

$7.351e-6

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $0
Volatility (ann.): 832%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

LILMET 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

LILMETBORDR

7 days-29.60%-10.80%BORDR
30 days-58.04%-99.45%LILMET

Correlation

-0.02over 20 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LILMET	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-88.3%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.07	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: LILMET outperformed BORDR by 203.2% — measured on the LILMET/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

LILMET →Bordrless →