lmeow vs Cash Cat

Cash Cat (CASHCAT) is 58.1× the size of lmeow (LMEOW) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, CASHCAT is ahead by 64.6 percentage points (LMEOW -99.9% against CASHCAT -35.3%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.84 across 23 shared trading days). LMEOW has been the more volatile of the two, at 416% annualised against CASHCAT's 264%.

Correlation: 0.84
Size ratio: 1 : 58.1
Ahead over 30 days: CASHCAT

lmeowLMEOW

$0.001874

24h: -2.79%
Market cap: $1.87M
Volume 24h: $13,435
Volatility (ann.): 416%

Cash CatCASHCAT

$0.110226

24h: +4.16%
Market cap: $108.87M
Volume 24h: $16.58M
Volatility (ann.): 264%

LMEOW 1.7%Share of the two combined market caps98.3% CASHCAT

Performance

LMEOWCASHCAT

7 days-99.83%+8.81%CASHCAT
30 days-99.87%-35.26%CASHCAT

Correlation

0.84over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LMEOW	CASHCAT
Max drawdown (400d)	-99.9%	-69.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.24	-0.02

Relative strength over 90 days: CASHCAT outperformed LMEOW by 99.7% — measured on the LMEOW/CASHCAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

lmeow →Cash Cat →