lmeow vs Popcat

Popcat (POPCAT) is 21.0× the size of lmeow (LMEOW) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, POPCAT is ahead by 83.1 percentage points (LMEOW -99.9% against POPCAT -16.8%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.64 across 26 shared trading days). LMEOW has been the more volatile of the two, at 416% annualised against POPCAT's 103%.

Correlation: 0.64
Size ratio: 1 : 21.0
Ahead over 30 days: POPCAT

lmeowLMEOW

$0.001874

24h: -2.79%
Market cap: $1.87M
Volume 24h: $13,435
Volatility (ann.): 416%

PopcatPOPCAT

$0.040154

24h: +0.62%
Market cap: $39.35M
Volume 24h: $3.63M
Volatility (ann.): 103%

LMEOW 4.5%Share of the two combined market caps95.5% POPCAT

Performance

LMEOWPOPCAT

7 days-99.83%-8.88%POPCAT
30 days-99.87%-16.79%POPCAT

Correlation

0.64over 26 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LMEOW	POPCAT
Max drawdown (400d)	-99.9%	-35.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.24	-0.13

Relative strength over 90 days: POPCAT outperformed LMEOW by 99.8% — measured on the LMEOW/POPCAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

lmeow →Popcat →