龙虾 (Lobster) vs MemeCore

MemeCore (M) is 113.7× the size of 龙虾 (Lobster) (龙虾) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, M is ahead by 61.8 percentage points (龙虾 -89.0% against M -27.1%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.07 across 56 shared trading days). 龙虾 has been the more volatile of the two, at 529% annualised against M's 108%.

Correlation: 0.07
Size ratio: 1 : 113.7
Ahead over 30 days: M

龙虾 (Lobster)龙虾

$0.017008

24h: -3.13%
Market cap: $17.01M
Volume 24h: $559,505
Volatility (ann.): 529%

MemeCoreM

$0.842833

24h: -1.71%
Market cap: $1.93B
Volume 24h: $1.87M
Volatility (ann.): 108%

龙虾 0.9%Share of the two combined market caps99.1% M

Performance

龙虾M

7 days-13.28%-19.48%龙虾
30 days-88.96%-27.12%M

Correlation

0.07over 56 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	龙虾	M
Max drawdown (400d)	-91.2%	-41.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.02	-0.23

Relative strength over 90 days: 龙虾 outperformed M by 17.6% — measured on the 龙虾/M ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

龙虾 (Lobster) →MemeCore →