Locked Money vs Pieverse

Pieverse (PIEVERSE) is 1644.2× the size of Locked Money (LMY) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, PIEVERSE is ahead by 22.1 percentage points (LMY -21.3% against PIEVERSE +0.8%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.18 across 24 shared trading days). PIEVERSE has been the more volatile of the two, at 144% annualised against LMY's 47%.

Correlation: 0.18
Size ratio: 1 : 1644.2
Ahead over 30 days: PIEVERSE

Locked MoneyLMY

$8.359e-5

24h: —
Market cap: $211,569
Volume 24h: $107
Volatility (ann.): 47%

PieversePIEVERSE

$1.2600

24h: +6.70%
Market cap: $347.85M
Volume 24h: $7.62M
Volatility (ann.): 144%

LMY 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% PIEVERSE

Performance

LMYPIEVERSE

7 days-2.95%+14.98%PIEVERSE
30 days-21.25%+0.85%PIEVERSE

Correlation

0.18over 24 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LMY	PIEVERSE
Max drawdown (400d)	-25.0%	-38.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.45	0.28

Relative strength over 90 days: PIEVERSE outperformed LMY by 9.9% — measured on the LMY/PIEVERSE ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Locked Money →Pieverse →