0xMarkets vs Chutes

Chutes (SN64) is 1338.0× the size of 0xMarkets (SN35) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN35 is ahead by 73.4 percentage points (SN35 +69.9% against SN64 -3.5%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.18 across 21 shared trading days). SN35 has been the more volatile of the two, at 1012% annualised against SN64's 140%.

Correlation: 0.18
Size ratio: 1 : 1338.0
Ahead over 30 days: SN35

0xMarketsSN35

$0.142249

24h: -0.90%
Market cap: $72,724
Volume 24h: $26,270
Volatility (ann.): 1012%

ChutesSN64

$15.3600

24h: -1.35%
Market cap: $97.30M
Volume 24h: $413,286
Volatility (ann.): 140%

SN35 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% SN64

Performance

SN35SN64

7 days+14.46%-8.16%SN35
30 days+69.89%-3.47%SN35

Correlation

0.18over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN35	SN64
Max drawdown (400d)	-59.3%	-32.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.07	0.03

Relative strength over 90 days: SN35 outperformed SN64 by 56.8% — measured on the SN35/SN64 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

0xMarkets →Chutes →