BTC$75,995.21▼ 5.27%ETH$2,251.70▼ 7.02%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.01%BNB$688.36▼ 3.69%XRP$1.24▼ 5.42%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$90.02▼ 6.65%TRX$0.3160▼ 1.14%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.39%ZEC$1,236.90▼ 5.46%HYPE$78.46▼ 8.56%XMR$118.70▼ 4.04%DOGE$0.0717▼ 7.07%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.84%LEO$9.35▲ 0.33%LINK$10.68▼ 7.55%ADA$0.1819▼ 7.80%BCH$278.40▼ 0.32%XLM$0.1536▼ 8.77%NEAR$3.70▼ 10.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$0.9997▼ 0.04%UNI$6.75▼ 11.87%RAIN$0.005686▼ 2.63%LTC$51.66▼ 8.07%CC$0.0932▼ 6.33%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.05%AVAX$8.17▼ 8.38%SUI$0.8494▼ 9.51%XAUT$4,071.40▲ 0.91%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.41%HBAR$0.0674▼ 7.46%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%QNT$191.35▼ 5.92%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.00%SHIB$0.000004▼ 6.34%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%TAO$216.50▼ 8.21%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.55%BTC$75,995.21▼ 5.27%ETH$2,251.70▼ 7.02%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.01%BNB$688.36▼ 3.69%XRP$1.24▼ 5.42%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$90.02▼ 6.65%TRX$0.3160▼ 1.14%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.39%ZEC$1,236.90▼ 5.46%HYPE$78.46▼ 8.56%XMR$118.70▼ 4.04%DOGE$0.0717▼ 7.07%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.84%LEO$9.35▲ 0.33%LINK$10.68▼ 7.55%ADA$0.1819▼ 7.80%BCH$278.40▼ 0.32%XLM$0.1536▼ 8.77%NEAR$3.70▼ 10.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$0.9997▼ 0.04%UNI$6.75▼ 11.87%RAIN$0.005686▼ 2.63%LTC$51.66▼ 8.07%CC$0.0932▼ 6.33%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.05%AVAX$8.17▼ 8.38%SUI$0.8494▼ 9.51%XAUT$4,071.40▲ 0.91%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.41%HBAR$0.0674▼ 7.46%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%QNT$191.35▼ 5.92%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.00%SHIB$0.000004▼ 6.34%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%TAO$216.50▼ 8.21%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.55%

Lolcat vs catwifhat

catwifhat ($CWIF) is 368.3× the size of Lolcat (LOLCAT) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move very closely together (correlation 0.92 across 22 shared trading days). LOLCAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 180% annualised against $CWIF's 131%.

Correlation
0.92
Size ratio
1 : 368.3
LolcatLOLCAT

$4.420e-5

24h
+3.87%
Market cap
$44,197
Volume 24h
$295
Volatility (ann.)
180%
catwifhat$CWIF

$1.628e-8

24h
+3.21%
Market cap
$16.28M
Volume 24h
$307
Volatility (ann.)
131%
LOLCAT 0.3%Share of the two combined market caps99.7% $CWIF

Performance

LOLCAT$CWIF

  1. 7 days-96.75%-33.42%$CWIF
  2. 30 days-97.12%-42.77%$CWIF
  3. 90 days-96.56%——

Correlation

0.92over 22 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricLOLCAT$CWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-98.1%-49.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.39-0.33

Relative strength over 90 days: $CWIF outperformed LOLCAT by 95.9% — measured on the LOLCAT/$CWIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.