longnose vs Bordrless

longnose (LONG) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, LONG is ahead by 66.8 percentage points (LONG -32.9% against BORDR -99.7%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.14 across 20 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 919% annualised against LONG's 245%.

Correlation: 0.14
Ahead over 30 days: LONG

longnoseLONG

$2.306e-6

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $1
Volatility (ann.): 245%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 919%

LONG 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

LONGBORDR

7 days-15.96%-35.15%LONG
30 days-32.89%-99.72%LONG

Correlation

0.14over 20 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LONG	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-61.1%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.13	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: LONG outperformed BORDR by 1386.3% — measured on the LONG/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

longnose →Bordrless →