BTC$78,443.99▲ 1.89%ETH$2,320.39▲ 2.40%USDT$0.9988▲ 0.01%BNB$701.77▲ 0.77%XRP$1.28▲ 2.09%USDC$1.00▲ 0.00%SOL$92.99▲ 0.75%TRX$0.3220▼ 0.11%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,282.25▲ 12.04%HYPE$86.59▲ 2.74%XMR$118.70▲ 1.97%DOGE$0.0752▲ 1.37%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.26▲ 1.77%LEO$9.32▲ 0.60%LINK$11.11▼ 0.32%ADA$0.1913▲ 1.82%XLM$0.1634▲ 0.97%BCH$275.30▼ 0.77%NEAR$4.05▲ 5.88%UNI$7.47▲ 4.68%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%RAIN$0.006198▼ 3.14%LTC$54.60▲ 0.93%CC$0.0989▲ 4.52%AVAX$8.71▲ 3.01%SUI$0.9144▲ 4.87%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.18▲ 2.23%XAUT$4,033.10▲ 3.28%HBAR$0.0706▲ 1.30%QNT$194.93▲ 0.02%USDG$1.0000▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.60%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.01%TAO$229.90▲ 3.47%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%CRO$0.0511▲ 2.13%BTC$78,443.99▲ 1.89%ETH$2,320.39▲ 2.40%USDT$0.9988▲ 0.01%BNB$701.77▲ 0.77%XRP$1.28▲ 2.09%USDC$1.00▲ 0.00%SOL$92.99▲ 0.75%TRX$0.3220▼ 0.11%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,282.25▲ 12.04%HYPE$86.59▲ 2.74%XMR$118.70▲ 1.97%DOGE$0.0752▲ 1.37%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.26▲ 1.77%LEO$9.32▲ 0.60%LINK$11.11▼ 0.32%ADA$0.1913▲ 1.82%XLM$0.1634▲ 0.97%BCH$275.30▼ 0.77%NEAR$4.05▲ 5.88%UNI$7.47▲ 4.68%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%RAIN$0.006198▼ 3.14%LTC$54.60▲ 0.93%CC$0.0989▲ 4.52%AVAX$8.71▲ 3.01%SUI$0.9144▲ 4.87%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.18▲ 2.23%XAUT$4,033.10▲ 3.28%HBAR$0.0706▲ 1.30%QNT$194.93▲ 0.02%USDG$1.0000▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.60%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.01%TAO$229.90▲ 3.47%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%CRO$0.0511▲ 2.13%

loom vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 2151.4× the size of loom (LOOM) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.03 across 35 shared trading days). LOOM has been the more volatile of the two, at 34127% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.03
Size ratio
1 : 2151.4
loomLOOM

$8.473e-5

24h
+4.02%
Market cap
$82,061
Volume 24h
$2,287
Volatility (ann.)
34127%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.176900

24h
+5.06%
Market cap
$176.54M
Volume 24h
$25.00M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
LOOM 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

LOOMWIF

  1. 7 days+80.16%-4.50%LOOM
  2. 30 days+6039.37%-32.23%LOOM
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.03over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricLOOMWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-98.8%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.000.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: LOOM outperformed WIF by 105.1% — measured on the LOOM/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.