LUCA vs SyncVault

LUCA (LUCA) is 84.0× the size of SyncVault (SVTS) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SVTS is ahead by 21.2 percentage points (LUCA -14.8% against SVTS +6.4%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.10 across 28 shared trading days). LUCA has been the more volatile of the two, at 50% annualised against SVTS's 41%.

Correlation: 0.10
Size ratio: 84.0×
Ahead over 30 days: SVTS

LUCALUCA

$0.276061

24h: -6.34%
Market cap: $14.00M
Volume 24h: $134,212
Volatility (ann.): 50%

SyncVaultSVTS

$0.231210

24h: +0.25%
Market cap: $166,630
Volume 24h: $64,688
Volatility (ann.): 41%

LUCA 98.8%Share of the two combined market caps1.2% SVTS

Performance

LUCASVTS

7 days-12.76%-2.15%SVTS
30 days-14.85%+6.40%SVTS

Correlation

0.10over 28 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LUCA	SVTS
Max drawdown (400d)	-24.3%	-6.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.11	0.16

Relative strength over 90 days: LUCA outperformed SVTS by 8.6% — measured on the LUCA/SVTS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

LUCA →SyncVault →