LUCIA THE BADDIE vs Bordrless

LUCIA THE BADDIE (LUCIA) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, LUCIA is ahead by 868.9 percentage points (LUCIA +769.4% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.01 across 35 shared trading days). LUCIA has been the more volatile of the two, at 13465% annualised against BORDR's 944%.

Correlation: -0.01
Ahead over 30 days: LUCIA

LUCIA THE BADDIELUCIA

$4.515e-5

24h: -9.49%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $6,540
Volatility (ann.): 13465%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

LUCIA 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

LUCIABORDR

7 days-38.35%-10.80%BORDR
30 days+769.44%-99.45%LUCIA

Correlation

-0.01over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	LUCIA	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-98.7%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.01	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: LUCIA outperformed BORDR by 1046.2% — measured on the LUCIA/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

LUCIA THE BADDIE →Bordrless →