BTC$73,931.48▼ 0.42%ETH$2,053.82▼ 1.77%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.03%BNB$680.39▼ 0.93%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%XRP$1.05▼ 2.31%SOL$83.79▼ 1.17%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.49%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 0.19%HYPE$72.01▼ 1.99%ZEC$979.86▼ 14.60%XMR$118.70▲ 4.21%DOGE$0.0679▼ 2.08%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%LEO$9.22▼ 0.51%WBT$71.17▼ 0.34%LINK$10.34▼ 1.07%ADA$0.1761▼ 1.15%XLM$0.1471▲ 0.69%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%NEAR$3.75▲ 3.20%BCH$228.50▼ 3.22%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%LTC$51.02▼ 0.59%UNI$6.43▼ 7.37%AVAX$8.53▲ 2.53%CC$0.0921▲ 0.44%SUI$0.8297▼ 0.37%GRAM$1.22▲ 11.47%XAUT$4,033.91▼ 0.75%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.02%RAIN$0.004234▲ 4.34%HBAR$0.0659▼ 1.29%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%USDG$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000004▲ 0.17%QNT$177.75▼ 5.01%TAO$219.70▼ 0.06%CRO$0.0480▲ 1.10%BTC$73,931.48▼ 0.42%ETH$2,053.82▼ 1.77%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.03%BNB$680.39▼ 0.93%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%XRP$1.05▼ 2.31%SOL$83.79▼ 1.17%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.49%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 0.19%HYPE$72.01▼ 1.99%ZEC$979.86▼ 14.60%XMR$118.70▲ 4.21%DOGE$0.0679▼ 2.08%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%LEO$9.22▼ 0.51%WBT$71.17▼ 0.34%LINK$10.34▼ 1.07%ADA$0.1761▼ 1.15%XLM$0.1471▲ 0.69%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%NEAR$3.75▲ 3.20%BCH$228.50▼ 3.22%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%LTC$51.02▼ 0.59%UNI$6.43▼ 7.37%AVAX$8.53▲ 2.53%CC$0.0921▲ 0.44%SUI$0.8297▼ 0.37%GRAM$1.22▲ 11.47%XAUT$4,033.91▼ 0.75%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.02%RAIN$0.004234▲ 4.34%HBAR$0.0659▼ 1.29%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%USDG$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000004▲ 0.17%QNT$177.75▼ 5.01%TAO$219.70▼ 0.06%CRO$0.0480▲ 1.10%

LUCIA THE BADDIE vs FLOAT

LUCIA THE BADDIE (LUCIA) and FLOAT (FLOAT) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.09 across 23 shared trading days). FLOAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 2418065% annualised against LUCIA's 13465%.

Correlation
-0.09
LUCIA THE BADDIELUCIA

$4.515e-5

24h
-9.49%
Market cap
—
Volume 24h
$6,540
Volatility (ann.)
13465%
FLOATFLOAT

$0.007822

24h
-6.47%
Market cap
$6.89M
Volume 24h
$4.44M
Volatility (ann.)
2418065%
LUCIA 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% FLOAT

Performance

LUCIAFLOAT

  1. 7 days-38.35%+207.39%FLOAT
  2. 30 days+769.44%——

Correlation

-0.09over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricLUCIAFLOAT
Max drawdown (400d)-98.7%-100.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.010.15

Relative strength over 90 days: FLOAT outperformed LUCIA by 99.8% — measured on the LUCIA/FLOAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.