BTC$79,153.72▲ 1.59%ETH$2,335.69▲ 1.51%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.03%BNB$705.39▲ 0.73%XRP$1.30▲ 0.34%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$94.06▼ 0.20%TRX$0.3193▼ 1.05%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.69%ZEC$1,314.86▲ 8.02%HYPE$85.87▼ 1.47%XMR$118.70▲ 3.01%DOGE$0.0760▲ 0.05%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.23▲ 1.34%LEO$9.33▲ 0.47%LINK$11.29▼ 0.18%ADA$0.1924▼ 0.17%XLM$0.1651▼ 1.56%BCH$276.50▼ 1.18%NEAR$4.09▲ 3.26%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%UNI$7.43▲ 0.12%RAIN$0.006034▼ 3.76%LTC$55.56▲ 0.95%CC$0.0976▲ 1.63%AVAX$8.78▲ 1.07%SUI$0.9167▲ 1.46%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.08%GRAM$1.18▲ 2.13%XAUT$4,034.17▲ 2.23%HBAR$0.0725▲ 0.60%QNT$203.32▲ 2.41%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.71%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.01%TAO$232.10▲ 1.09%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0507▲ 0.24%BTC$79,153.72▲ 1.59%ETH$2,335.69▲ 1.51%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.03%BNB$705.39▲ 0.73%XRP$1.30▲ 0.34%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$94.06▼ 0.20%TRX$0.3193▼ 1.05%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.69%ZEC$1,314.86▲ 8.02%HYPE$85.87▼ 1.47%XMR$118.70▲ 3.01%DOGE$0.0760▲ 0.05%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.23▲ 1.34%LEO$9.33▲ 0.47%LINK$11.29▼ 0.18%ADA$0.1924▼ 0.17%XLM$0.1651▼ 1.56%BCH$276.50▼ 1.18%NEAR$4.09▲ 3.26%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%UNI$7.43▲ 0.12%RAIN$0.006034▼ 3.76%LTC$55.56▲ 0.95%CC$0.0976▲ 1.63%AVAX$8.78▲ 1.07%SUI$0.9167▲ 1.46%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.08%GRAM$1.18▲ 2.13%XAUT$4,034.17▲ 2.23%HBAR$0.0725▲ 0.60%QNT$203.32▲ 2.41%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.71%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.01%TAO$232.10▲ 1.09%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0507▲ 0.24%

Lunar Lad vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 585.0× the size of Lunar Lad (LAD) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.75 across 38 shared trading days). LAD has been the more volatile of the two, at 144% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.75
Size ratio
1 : 585.0
Lunar LadLAD

$0.000297

24h
-0.31%
Market cap
$296,645
Volume 24h
$235,712
Volatility (ann.)
144%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.176000

24h
+0.63%
Market cap
$173.54M
Volume 24h
$24.25M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
LAD 0.2%Share of the two combined market caps99.8% WIF

Performance

LADWIF

  1. 7 days-45.49%-4.50%WIF
  2. 30 days-47.12%-32.23%WIF
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.75over 38 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.7690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricLADWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-55.7%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.300.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed LAD by 35.4% — measured on the LAD/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.