BTC$75,949.47▼ 5.30%ETH$2,234.74▼ 7.64%USDT$0.9989▼ 0.04%BNB$689.43▼ 3.79%XRP$1.22▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.14▼ 4.88%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.44%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.51%ZEC$1,261.35▼ 2.16%HYPE$78.00▼ 5.17%XMR$118.70▼ 3.47%DOGE$0.0721▼ 5.77%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$72.98▼ 5.92%LEO$9.32▼ 0.22%LINK$10.73▼ 6.18%ADA$0.1823▼ 6.78%BCH$273.10▼ 2.93%XLM$0.1543▼ 7.03%NEAR$3.71▼ 7.48%USDE$1.00▼ 0.10%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%RAIN$0.005929▼ 0.45%UNI$6.85▼ 9.97%LTC$52.14▼ 6.87%CC$0.0973▼ 0.73%AVAX$8.30▼ 4.70%USD1$0.9997▼ 0.02%SUI$0.8502▼ 7.45%XAUT$4,076.31▲ 0.66%GRAM$1.12▼ 5.37%HBAR$0.0679▼ 5.54%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%QNT$189.84▼ 5.99%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.64%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%TAO$218.30▼ 6.42%CRO$0.0491▼ 4.84%BTC$75,949.47▼ 5.30%ETH$2,234.74▼ 7.64%USDT$0.9989▼ 0.04%BNB$689.43▼ 3.79%XRP$1.22▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.14▼ 4.88%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.44%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.51%ZEC$1,261.35▼ 2.16%HYPE$78.00▼ 5.17%XMR$118.70▼ 3.47%DOGE$0.0721▼ 5.77%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$72.98▼ 5.92%LEO$9.32▼ 0.22%LINK$10.73▼ 6.18%ADA$0.1823▼ 6.78%BCH$273.10▼ 2.93%XLM$0.1543▼ 7.03%NEAR$3.71▼ 7.48%USDE$1.00▼ 0.10%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%RAIN$0.005929▼ 0.45%UNI$6.85▼ 9.97%LTC$52.14▼ 6.87%CC$0.0973▼ 0.73%AVAX$8.30▼ 4.70%USD1$0.9997▼ 0.02%SUI$0.8502▼ 7.45%XAUT$4,076.31▲ 0.66%GRAM$1.12▼ 5.37%HBAR$0.0679▼ 5.54%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%QNT$189.84▼ 5.99%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.64%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%TAO$218.30▼ 6.42%CRO$0.0491▼ 4.84%

Mackerel vs Shiba Inu

Shiba Inu (SHIB) is 64686.8× the size of Mackerel (MACKE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.28 across 187 shared trading days). MACKE has been the more volatile of the two, at 162% annualised against SHIB's 69%.

Correlation
0.28
Size ratio
1 : 64686.8
MackerelMACKE

$0.014121

24h
—
Market cap
$41,460
Volume 24h
$3,131
Volatility (ann.)
162%
Shiba InuSHIB

$4.550e-6

24h
-3.64%
Market cap
$2.68B
Volume 24h
$61.37M
Volatility (ann.)
69%
MACKE 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% SHIB

Performance

MACKESHIB

  1. 7 days-18.95%-4.83%SHIB
  2. 30 days+19.96%-19.56%MACKE
  3. 90 days-35.28%+1.07%SHIB
  4. 1 year—-46.55%—

Correlation

0.28over 187 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1390d: 0.151y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricMACKESHIB
Max drawdown (400d)-54.5%-68.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.180.01
Best 30 days (past year)—+39.1%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-38.4%

Relative strength over 90 days: SHIB outperformed MACKE by 23.6% — measured on the MACKE/SHIB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.