BTC$73,931.48▼ 0.42%ETH$2,053.82▼ 1.77%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.03%BNB$680.39▼ 0.93%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%XRP$1.05▼ 2.31%SOL$83.79▼ 1.17%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.49%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 0.19%HYPE$72.01▼ 1.99%ZEC$979.86▼ 14.60%XMR$118.70▲ 4.21%DOGE$0.0679▼ 2.08%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%LEO$9.22▼ 0.51%WBT$71.17▼ 0.34%LINK$10.34▼ 1.07%ADA$0.1761▼ 1.15%XLM$0.1471▲ 0.69%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%NEAR$3.75▲ 3.20%BCH$228.50▼ 3.22%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%LTC$51.02▼ 0.59%UNI$6.43▼ 7.37%AVAX$8.53▲ 2.53%CC$0.0921▲ 0.44%SUI$0.8297▼ 0.37%GRAM$1.22▲ 11.47%XAUT$4,033.91▼ 0.75%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.02%RAIN$0.004234▲ 4.34%HBAR$0.0659▼ 1.29%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%USDG$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000004▲ 0.17%QNT$177.75▼ 5.01%TAO$219.70▼ 0.06%CRO$0.0480▲ 1.10%BTC$73,931.48▼ 0.42%ETH$2,053.82▼ 1.77%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.03%BNB$680.39▼ 0.93%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%XRP$1.05▼ 2.31%SOL$83.79▼ 1.17%TRX$0.3172▼ 0.49%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 0.19%HYPE$72.01▼ 1.99%ZEC$979.86▼ 14.60%XMR$118.70▲ 4.21%DOGE$0.0679▼ 2.08%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%LEO$9.22▼ 0.51%WBT$71.17▼ 0.34%LINK$10.34▼ 1.07%ADA$0.1761▼ 1.15%XLM$0.1471▲ 0.69%USDE$1.00▲ 0.03%NEAR$3.75▲ 3.20%BCH$228.50▼ 3.22%DAI$1.00▼ 0.00%LTC$51.02▼ 0.59%UNI$6.43▼ 7.37%AVAX$8.53▲ 2.53%CC$0.0921▲ 0.44%SUI$0.8297▼ 0.37%GRAM$1.22▲ 11.47%XAUT$4,033.91▼ 0.75%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.02%RAIN$0.004234▲ 4.34%HBAR$0.0659▼ 1.29%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.00%USDG$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000004▲ 0.17%QNT$177.75▼ 5.01%TAO$219.70▼ 0.06%CRO$0.0480▲ 1.10%

MamAOCita vs Achi

MamAOCita (MAMAOCITA) and Achi (ACH) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.15 across 42 shared trading days). MAMAOCITA has been the more volatile of the two, at 448% annualised against ACH's 81%.

Correlation
-0.15
MamAOCitaMAMAOCITA

$0.000258

24h
-26.55%
Market cap
—
Volume 24h
$4,366
Volatility (ann.)
448%
AchiACH

$0.004230

24h
-39.38%
Market cap
—
Volume 24h
$661,006
Volatility (ann.)
81%

Performance

MAMAOCITAACH

  1. 7 days-27.30%-7.63%ACH
  2. 30 days-71.96%-30.72%ACH
  3. 90 days—+3.41%—
  4. 1 year—-65.53%—

Correlation

-0.15over 42 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricMAMAOCITAACH
Max drawdown (400d)-78.9%-78.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.070.05
Best 30 days (past year)—+62.8%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-41.8%

Relative strength over 90 days: ACH outperformed MAMAOCITA by 5.3% — measured on the MAMAOCITA/ACH ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.