BTC$76,194.01▼ 5.29%ETH$2,255.26▼ 7.20%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$692.01▼ 3.59%XRP$1.24▼ 5.48%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.55▼ 6.29%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.68%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.61%ZEC$1,250.38▼ 4.32%HYPE$78.54▼ 7.36%XMR$118.70▼ 3.92%DOGE$0.0722▼ 6.29%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$73.19▼ 5.84%LEO$9.32▼ 0.02%LINK$10.80▼ 6.13%ADA$0.1840▼ 6.64%BCH$275.70▼ 2.40%XLM$0.1543▼ 7.71%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.46%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006086▼ 0.83%UNI$6.85▼ 9.89%LTC$52.44▼ 6.93%CC$0.0976▲ 0.11%AVAX$8.38▼ 5.41%USD1$0.9988▼ 0.12%SUI$0.8574▼ 8.39%XAUT$4,089.80▲ 0.96%GRAM$1.12▼ 6.29%HBAR$0.0681▼ 6.24%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%QNT$190.97▼ 6.89%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%TAO$220.30▼ 6.40%CRO$0.0492▼ 4.68%BTC$76,194.01▼ 5.29%ETH$2,255.26▼ 7.20%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$692.01▼ 3.59%XRP$1.24▼ 5.48%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.55▼ 6.29%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.68%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.61%ZEC$1,250.38▼ 4.32%HYPE$78.54▼ 7.36%XMR$118.70▼ 3.92%DOGE$0.0722▼ 6.29%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$73.19▼ 5.84%LEO$9.32▼ 0.02%LINK$10.80▼ 6.13%ADA$0.1840▼ 6.64%BCH$275.70▼ 2.40%XLM$0.1543▼ 7.71%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.46%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006086▼ 0.83%UNI$6.85▼ 9.89%LTC$52.44▼ 6.93%CC$0.0976▲ 0.11%AVAX$8.38▼ 5.41%USD1$0.9988▼ 0.12%SUI$0.8574▼ 8.39%XAUT$4,089.80▲ 0.96%GRAM$1.12▼ 6.29%HBAR$0.0681▼ 6.24%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%QNT$190.97▼ 6.89%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%TAO$220.30▼ 6.40%CRO$0.0492▼ 4.68%

Mascot of the Trenches vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 18702.4× the size of Mascot of the Trenches (RUG) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.06 across 22 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against RUG's 58%.

Correlation
-0.06
Size ratio
1 : 18702.4
Mascot of the TrenchesRUG

$8.750e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$8,739
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
58%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.164600

24h
-5.87%
Market cap
$163.43M
Volume 24h
$31.51M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
RUG 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

RUGWIF

  1. 7 days-7.56%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days—-32.13%—
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.06over 22 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricRUGWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-29.5%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.510.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: RUG outperformed WIF by 3.2% — measured on the RUG/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.