BTC$80,646.00▲ 3.95%ETH$2,435.02▲ 6.18%USDT$0.9992▲ 0.03%BNB$719.31▲ 2.77%XRP$1.31▲ 2.71%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$96.71▲ 3.68%TRX$0.3202▼ 0.83%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.88%ZEC$1,317.46▲ 9.45%HYPE$85.78▼ 0.76%DOGE$0.0775▲ 2.88%XMR$118.70▲ 1.76%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$77.99▲ 4.61%LINK$11.61▲ 4.68%LEO$9.32▲ 0.56%ADA$0.1985▲ 4.59%XLM$0.1684▲ 2.53%BCH$282.60▲ 2.14%NEAR$4.13▲ 8.42%UNI$7.71▲ 5.42%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%LTC$56.38▲ 4.28%RAIN$0.005842▼ 5.57%CC$0.0992▲ 4.19%AVAX$8.97▲ 4.58%SUI$0.9457▲ 5.67%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.19▲ 2.10%XAUT$4,036.60▲ 2.55%HBAR$0.0729▲ 4.19%QNT$204.30▲ 5.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.04%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$237.00▲ 4.59%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.00%CRO$0.0520▲ 2.92%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%BTC$80,646.00▲ 3.95%ETH$2,435.02▲ 6.18%USDT$0.9992▲ 0.03%BNB$719.31▲ 2.77%XRP$1.31▲ 2.71%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$96.71▲ 3.68%TRX$0.3202▼ 0.83%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.88%ZEC$1,317.46▲ 9.45%HYPE$85.78▼ 0.76%DOGE$0.0775▲ 2.88%XMR$118.70▲ 1.76%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$77.99▲ 4.61%LINK$11.61▲ 4.68%LEO$9.32▲ 0.56%ADA$0.1985▲ 4.59%XLM$0.1684▲ 2.53%BCH$282.60▲ 2.14%NEAR$4.13▲ 8.42%UNI$7.71▲ 5.42%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%LTC$56.38▲ 4.28%RAIN$0.005842▼ 5.57%CC$0.0992▲ 4.19%AVAX$8.97▲ 4.58%SUI$0.9457▲ 5.67%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.19▲ 2.10%XAUT$4,036.60▲ 2.55%HBAR$0.0729▲ 4.19%QNT$204.30▲ 5.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.04%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$237.00▲ 4.59%PYUSD$0.9999▼ 0.00%CRO$0.0520▲ 2.92%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%

Matrix Layer Protocol vs MiL.k

Matrix Layer Protocol (MLP) and MiL.k (MLK) compared side by side. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.40 across 31 shared trading days). MLK has been the more volatile of the two, at 795% annualised against MLP's 328%.

Correlation
0.40
Matrix Layer ProtocolMLP

$2.540e-6

24h
—
Market cap
—
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
328%
MiL.kMLK

$0.038382

24h
+1.40%
Market cap
$22.39M
Volume 24h
$1.79M
Volatility (ann.)
795%
MLP 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% MLK

Performance

MLPMLK

  1. 7 days-7.56%+7.97%MLK
  2. 30 days+9.45%+3.25%MLP
  3. 90 days-62.89%——
  4. 1 year-98.24%——

Correlation

0.40over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricMLPMLK
Max drawdown (400d)-99.0%-70.3%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.130.01

Relative strength over 90 days: MLK outperformed MLP by 14.0% — measured on the MLP/MLK ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.