BTC$76,152.02▼ 5.51%ETH$2,254.32▼ 7.34%USDT$0.9991▼ 0.02%BNB$693.18▼ 3.55%XRP$1.23▼ 6.20%USDC$1.00▼ 0.00%SOL$89.58▼ 6.59%TRX$0.3174▼ 0.86%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,248.94▼ 4.45%HYPE$78.01▼ 8.01%XMR$118.70▼ 3.02%DOGE$0.0719▼ 6.85%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$73.33▼ 6.05%LEO$9.33▲ 0.05%LINK$10.73▼ 7.15%ADA$0.1820▼ 7.81%BCH$273.40▼ 3.07%XLM$0.1537▼ 8.31%NEAR$3.69▼ 10.61%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%USDE$1.00▼ 0.03%RAIN$0.006144▼ 2.21%UNI$6.84▼ 10.81%LTC$51.91▼ 7.84%CC$0.0958▼ 1.95%AVAX$8.28▼ 6.37%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.06%SUI$0.8506▼ 9.29%XAUT$4,090.95▲ 1.03%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.23%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.47%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%QNT$191.70▼ 6.62%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.55%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$218.10▼ 7.69%CRO$0.0489▼ 5.78%BTC$76,152.02▼ 5.51%ETH$2,254.32▼ 7.34%USDT$0.9991▼ 0.02%BNB$693.18▼ 3.55%XRP$1.23▼ 6.20%USDC$1.00▼ 0.00%SOL$89.58▼ 6.59%TRX$0.3174▼ 0.86%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,248.94▼ 4.45%HYPE$78.01▼ 8.01%XMR$118.70▼ 3.02%DOGE$0.0719▼ 6.85%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$73.33▼ 6.05%LEO$9.33▲ 0.05%LINK$10.73▼ 7.15%ADA$0.1820▼ 7.81%BCH$273.40▼ 3.07%XLM$0.1537▼ 8.31%NEAR$3.69▼ 10.61%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%USDE$1.00▼ 0.03%RAIN$0.006144▼ 2.21%UNI$6.84▼ 10.81%LTC$51.91▼ 7.84%CC$0.0958▼ 1.95%AVAX$8.28▼ 6.37%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.06%SUI$0.8506▼ 9.29%XAUT$4,090.95▲ 1.03%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.23%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.47%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%QNT$191.70▼ 6.62%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.55%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$218.10▼ 7.69%CRO$0.0489▼ 5.78%

Matt vs Decentraland

Decentraland (MANA) is 56641.2× the size of Matt (MATT) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.15 across 31 shared trading days). MATT has been the more volatile of the two, at 3164% annualised against MANA's 77%.

Correlation
0.15
Size ratio
1 : 56641.2
MattMATT

$3.623e-7

24h
—
Market cap
$2,441
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
3164%
DecentralandMANA

$0.070800

24h
-5.17%
Market cap
$138.25M
Volume 24h
$10.32M
Volatility (ann.)
77%
MATT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% MANA

Performance

MATTMANA

  1. 7 days-10.84%-5.29%MANA
  2. 30 days-50.01%-28.52%MANA
  3. 90 days—+13.08%—
  4. 1 year—-62.51%—

Correlation

0.15over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricMATTMANA
Max drawdown (400d)-90.9%-82.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.020.19
Best 30 days (past year)—+43.6%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-42.8%

Relative strength over 90 days: MANA outperformed MATT by 62.9% — measured on the MATT/MANA ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.