BTC$80,252.01▲ 3.60%ETH$2,419.52▲ 5.70%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.03%BNB$716.11▲ 2.82%XRP$1.30▲ 2.03%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.05▲ 2.05%TRX$0.3198▼ 1.21%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.93%ZEC$1,280.26▲ 6.22%HYPE$84.54▼ 1.17%DOGE$0.0765▲ 1.92%XMR$118.70▲ 1.31%USDS$0.9994▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.30%LINK$11.47▲ 3.42%LEO$9.32▲ 0.59%ADA$0.1957▲ 3.03%XLM$0.1665▲ 1.75%BCH$279.90▲ 1.35%NEAR$4.04▲ 5.53%UNI$7.63▲ 5.41%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006272▲ 2.12%LTC$56.01▲ 3.17%CC$0.0979▲ 2.83%AVAX$8.82▲ 3.44%SUI$0.9274▲ 3.74%USD1$0.9992▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.18▲ 0.65%XAUT$4,045.32▲ 3.17%HBAR$0.0719▲ 3.44%QNT$203.27▲ 6.39%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.34%TAO$234.30▲ 3.41%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0517▲ 2.37%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%BTC$80,252.01▲ 3.60%ETH$2,419.52▲ 5.70%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.03%BNB$716.11▲ 2.82%XRP$1.30▲ 2.03%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.05▲ 2.05%TRX$0.3198▼ 1.21%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.93%ZEC$1,280.26▲ 6.22%HYPE$84.54▼ 1.17%DOGE$0.0765▲ 1.92%XMR$118.70▲ 1.31%USDS$0.9994▲ 0.01%WBT$77.79▲ 4.30%LINK$11.47▲ 3.42%LEO$9.32▲ 0.59%ADA$0.1957▲ 3.03%XLM$0.1665▲ 1.75%BCH$279.90▲ 1.35%NEAR$4.04▲ 5.53%UNI$7.63▲ 5.41%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006272▲ 2.12%LTC$56.01▲ 3.17%CC$0.0979▲ 2.83%AVAX$8.82▲ 3.44%SUI$0.9274▲ 3.74%USD1$0.9992▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.18▲ 0.65%XAUT$4,045.32▲ 3.17%HBAR$0.0719▲ 3.44%QNT$203.27▲ 6.39%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.34%TAO$234.30▲ 3.41%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0517▲ 2.37%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%

McDull (Meme) vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 26.1× the size of McDull (Meme) (MCDULL) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.78 across 34 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 98% annualised.

Correlation
0.78
Size ratio
1 : 26.1
McDull (Meme)MCDULL

$7.515e-7

24h
—
Market cap
$6.68M
Volume 24h
$76
Volatility (ann.)
92%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.174100

24h
+1.23%
Market cap
$174.05M
Volume 24h
$28.74M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
MCDULL 3.7%Share of the two combined market caps96.3% WIF

Performance

MCDULLWIF

  1. 7 days-7.87%-4.50%WIF
  2. 30 days-18.68%-32.23%MCDULL
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.78over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.8390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricMCDULLWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-27.4%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.200.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed MCDULL by 10.5% — measured on the MCDULL/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.