Memory cow Moo vs Cash Cat

Cash Cat (CASHCAT) is 77.5× the size of Memory cow Moo (MOO) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, CASHCAT is ahead by 59.3 percentage points (MOO -94.6% against CASHCAT -35.3%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.42 across 28 shared trading days). MOO has been the more volatile of the two, at 513% annualised against CASHCAT's 264%.

Correlation: 0.42
Size ratio: 1 : 77.5
Ahead over 30 days: CASHCAT

Memory cow MooMOO

$0.001411

24h: -4.81%
Market cap: $1.39M
Volume 24h: $979,020
Volatility (ann.): 513%

Cash CatCASHCAT

$0.109276

24h: +5.35%
Market cap: $107.94M
Volume 24h: $17.36M
Volatility (ann.): 264%

MOO 1.3%Share of the two combined market caps98.7% CASHCAT

Performance

MOOCASHCAT

7 days-22.16%+8.81%CASHCAT
30 days-94.56%-35.26%CASHCAT

Correlation

0.42over 28 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	MOO	CASHCAT
Max drawdown (400d)	-95.7%	-69.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.18	-0.02

Relative strength over 90 days: CASHCAT outperformed MOO by 81.5% — measured on the MOO/CASHCAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Memory cow Moo →Cash Cat →