Meta (Coinbase Tokenized Stock) vs Circle Internet Group (bStocks Tokenized Stock)

Circle Internet Group (bStocks Tokenized Stock) (CRCLB) is 37.1× the size of Meta (Coinbase Tokenized Stock) (METAC) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.23 across 40 shared trading days). CRCLB has been the more volatile of the two, at 82% annualised against METAC's 62%.

Correlation: 0.23
Size ratio: 1 : 37.1

Meta (Coinbase Tokenized Stock)METAC

$612.8200

24h: +0.75%
Market cap: $4.50M
Volume 24h: $11.92M
Volatility (ann.): 62%

Circle Internet Group (bStocks Tokenized Stock)CRCLB

$76.6000

24h: +3.53%
Market cap: $166.96M
Volume 24h: $35.40M
Volatility (ann.): 82%

METAC 2.6%Share of the two combined market caps97.4% CRCLB

Performance

METACCRCLB

7 days-0.15%-7.34%METAC
30 days+0.99%-10.38%METAC
90 days—+21.21%—

Correlation

0.23over 40 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	METAC	CRCLB
Max drawdown (400d)	-21.5%	-31.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.10	0.25

Relative strength over 90 days: METAC outperformed CRCLB by 23.9% — measured on the METAC/CRCLB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Meta (Coinbase Tokenized Stock) →Circle Internet Group (bStocks Tokenized Stock) →