BTC$80,460.66▲ 4.78%ETH$2,415.25▲ 6.93%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$715.59▲ 3.46%XRP$1.30▲ 3.83%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$95.62▲ 4.23%TRX$0.3200▼ 0.91%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,290.50▲ 7.51%HYPE$83.93▲ 1.04%DOGE$0.0768▲ 3.86%XMR$118.70▲ 1.83%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$77.85▲ 5.48%LINK$11.39▲ 5.34%LEO$9.34▲ 0.39%ADA$0.1959▲ 5.32%XLM$0.1669▲ 4.73%BCH$280.30▲ 3.64%NEAR$4.01▲ 6.23%UNI$7.64▲ 7.75%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.12▲ 5.37%RAIN$0.005966▼ 9.23%CC$0.0992▲ 3.66%AVAX$8.68▲ 4.36%SUI$0.9263▲ 5.78%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.06%GRAM$1.17▲ 0.93%XAUT$4,095.70▲ 3.84%HBAR$0.0723▲ 5.66%QNT$201.90▲ 6.49%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.82%TAO$234.90▲ 6.04%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%CRO$0.0520▲ 4.78%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%BTC$80,460.66▲ 4.78%ETH$2,415.25▲ 6.93%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$715.59▲ 3.46%XRP$1.30▲ 3.83%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$95.62▲ 4.23%TRX$0.3200▼ 0.91%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,290.50▲ 7.51%HYPE$83.93▲ 1.04%DOGE$0.0768▲ 3.86%XMR$118.70▲ 1.83%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$77.85▲ 5.48%LINK$11.39▲ 5.34%LEO$9.34▲ 0.39%ADA$0.1959▲ 5.32%XLM$0.1669▲ 4.73%BCH$280.30▲ 3.64%NEAR$4.01▲ 6.23%UNI$7.64▲ 7.75%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.12▲ 5.37%RAIN$0.005966▼ 9.23%CC$0.0992▲ 3.66%AVAX$8.68▲ 4.36%SUI$0.9263▲ 5.78%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.06%GRAM$1.17▲ 0.93%XAUT$4,095.70▲ 3.84%HBAR$0.0723▲ 5.66%QNT$201.90▲ 6.49%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.82%TAO$234.90▲ 6.04%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%CRO$0.0520▲ 4.78%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%

Metars Genesis vs Ethereum Name Service

Metars Genesis (MRS) and Ethereum Name Service (ENS) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.27 across 31 shared trading days). MRS has been the more volatile of the two, at 266% annualised against ENS's 82%.

Correlation
0.27
Metars GenesisMRS

$0.464767

24h
+0.20%
Market cap
—
Volume 24h
$5,292
Volatility (ann.)
266%
Ethereum Name ServiceENS

$5.0300

24h
+5.73%
Market cap
$214.61M
Volume 24h
$13.13M
Volatility (ann.)
82%
MRS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% ENS

Performance

MRSENS

  1. 7 days-51.08%-3.96%ENS
  2. 30 days-10.83%-25.80%MRS
  3. 90 days—+21.19%—
  4. 1 year—-59.35%—

Correlation

0.27over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricMRSENS
Max drawdown (400d)-63.1%-82.4%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.040.23
Best 30 days (past year)—+48.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-51.6%

Relative strength over 90 days: MRS outperformed ENS by 25.1% — measured on the MRS/ENS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.