mfercoin vs Loaded Lions

Loaded Lions (LION) is 79.9× the size of mfercoin (MFER) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, LION is ahead by 9.7 percentage points (MFER -35.2% against LION -25.5%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.75 across 32 shared trading days). MFER has been the more volatile of the two, at 131% annualised against LION's 71%.

Correlation: 0.75
Size ratio: 1 : 79.9
Ahead over 30 days: LION

mfercoinMFER

$0.000449

24h: -0.27%
Market cap: $448,981
Volume 24h: $127
Volatility (ann.): 131%

Loaded LionsLION

$0.001169

24h: +4.39%
Market cap: $35.86M
Volume 24h: $30,538
Volatility (ann.): 71%

MFER 1.2%Share of the two combined market caps98.8% LION

Performance

MFERLION

7 days-7.86%-4.23%LION
30 days-35.22%-25.48%LION

Correlation

0.75over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.7690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	MFER	LION
Max drawdown (400d)	-44.0%	-31.9%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.29	-0.33

Relative strength over 90 days: LION outperformed MFER by 17.9% — measured on the MFER/LION ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

mfercoin →Loaded Lions →