BTC$80,752.01▲ 5.09%ETH$2,432.12▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.65▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.31▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3198▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,314.30▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.39▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.49▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1977▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1687▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.06▲ 7.53%UNI$7.68▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.31▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.77▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9312▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,110.40▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0729▲ 6.49%QNT$203.25▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,752.01▲ 5.09%ETH$2,432.12▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.65▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.31▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3198▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,314.30▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.39▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.49▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1977▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1687▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.06▲ 7.53%UNI$7.68▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.31▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.77▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9312▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,110.40▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0729▲ 6.49%QNT$203.25▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Midterm Elections vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 72099.5× the size of Midterm Elections (MIDTERMS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.09 across 32 shared trading days). MIDTERMS has been the more volatile of the two, at 162% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.09
Size ratio
1 : 72099.5
Midterm ElectionsMIDTERMS

$2.480e-6

24h
-19.64%
Market cap
$2,391
Volume 24h
$328
Volatility (ann.)
162%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.172600

24h
+1.28%
Market cap
$172.38M
Volume 24h
$31.26M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
MIDTERMS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

MIDTERMSWIF

  1. 7 days-49.16%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-53.90%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.09over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricMIDTERMSWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-58.5%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.330.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed MIDTERMS by 32.0% — measured on the MIDTERMS/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.