THOR vs lium

lium (SN51) is 25.5× the size of THOR (SN112) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN112 is ahead by 126.7 percentage points (SN112 +142.9% against SN51 +16.1%). Their daily returns move very closely together (correlation 0.92 across 23 shared trading days). SN112 has been the more volatile of the two, at 240% annualised against SN51's 140%.

Correlation: 0.92
Size ratio: 1 : 25.5
Ahead over 30 days: SN112

THORSN112

$1.8700

24h: +4.02%
Market cap: $5.29M
Volume 24h: $260,718
Volatility (ann.): 240%

liumSN51

$26.6400

24h: +3.01%
Market cap: $135.00M
Volume 24h: $4.12M
Volatility (ann.): 140%

SN112 3.8%Share of the two combined market caps96.2% SN51

Performance

SN112SN51

7 days-9.31%-13.99%SN112
30 days+142.87%+16.13%SN112

Correlation

0.92over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN112	SN51
Max drawdown (400d)	-24.1%	-19.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.60	0.59

Relative strength over 90 days: SN112 outperformed SN51 by 82.3% — measured on the SN112/SN51 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

THOR →lium →