Molt Road vs ARGUE.FUN

ARGUE.FUN ($ARGUE) is 11.0× the size of Molt Road (MOLTROAD) by market capitalisation. Over the past 90 days, $ARGUE is ahead by 36.3 percentage points (MOLTROAD -6.3% against $ARGUE +30.0%). Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.62 across 115 shared trading days). MOLTROAD has been the more volatile of the two, at 231% annualised against $ARGUE's 112%.

Correlation: 0.62
Size ratio: 1 : 11.0
Ahead over 90 days: $ARGUE

Molt RoadMOLTROAD

$2.739e-7

24h: —
Market cap: $27,389
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 231%

ARGUE.FUN$ARGUE

$3.980e-6

24h: —
Market cap: $302,547
Volume 24h: $166
Volatility (ann.): 112%

MOLTROAD 8.3%Share of the two combined market caps91.7% $ARGUE

Performance

MOLTROAD$ARGUE

7 days-17.92%-14.97%$ARGUE
30 days+14.08%-8.32%MOLTROAD
90 days-6.26%+30.02%$ARGUE

Correlation

0.62over 115 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.9390d: 0.641y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	MOLTROAD	$ARGUE
Max drawdown (400d)	-96.4%	-84.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.06	0.41

Relative strength over 90 days: MOLTROAD outperformed $ARGUE by 27.1% — measured on the MOLTROAD/$ARGUE ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Molt Road →ARGUE.FUN →