Molthunt vs ARGUE.FUN

ARGUE.FUN ($ARGUE) is 7.5× the size of Molthunt (MOLTH) by market capitalisation. Over the past 90 days, $ARGUE is ahead by 62.0 percentage points (MOLTH -32.0% against $ARGUE +30.0%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.12 across 104 shared trading days). MOLTH has been the more volatile of the two, at 457% annualised against $ARGUE's 112%.

Correlation: 0.12
Size ratio: 1 : 7.5
Ahead over 90 days: $ARGUE

MolthuntMOLTH

$4.052e-7

24h: —
Market cap: $40,522
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 457%

ARGUE.FUN$ARGUE

$3.980e-6

24h: —
Market cap: $302,547
Volume 24h: $166
Volatility (ann.): 112%

MOLTH 11.8%Share of the two combined market caps88.2% $ARGUE

Performance

MOLTH$ARGUE

7 days-16.80%-14.97%$ARGUE
30 days+4.73%-8.32%MOLTH
90 days-32.02%+30.02%$ARGUE

Correlation

0.12over 104 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.9090d: 0.561y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	MOLTH	$ARGUE
Max drawdown (400d)	-90.8%	-84.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.36	0.41

Relative strength over 90 days: $ARGUE outperformed MOLTH by 35.7% — measured on the MOLTH/$ARGUE ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Molthunt →ARGUE.FUN →