moltline vs ARGUE.FUN

ARGUE.FUN ($ARGUE) is 10.3× the size of moltline (MOLTLINE) by market capitalisation. Over the past 90 days, $ARGUE is ahead by 81.1 percentage points (MOLTLINE -58.5% against $ARGUE +22.5%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.17 across 128 shared trading days). MOLTLINE has been the more volatile of the two, at 508% annualised against $ARGUE's 112%.

Correlation: 0.17
Size ratio: 1 : 10.3
Ahead over 90 days: $ARGUE

moltlineMOLTLINE

$2.733e-7

24h: —
Market cap: $27,332
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 508%

ARGUE.FUN$ARGUE

$3.710e-6

24h: -6.91%
Market cap: $281,648
Volume 24h: $297
Volatility (ann.): 112%

MOLTLINE 8.8%Share of the two combined market caps91.2% $ARGUE

Performance

MOLTLINE$ARGUE

7 days-18.77%-0.64%$ARGUE
30 days-8.67%-13.01%MOLTLINE
90 days-58.54%+22.53%$ARGUE

Correlation

0.17over 128 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6690d: 0.521y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	MOLTLINE	$ARGUE
Max drawdown (400d)	-97.5%	-84.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.52	0.30

Relative strength over 90 days: $ARGUE outperformed MOLTLINE by 46.6% — measured on the MOLTLINE/$ARGUE ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

moltline →ARGUE.FUN →