Mound vs XRP

Mound (MND) and XRP (XRP) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.34 across 25 shared trading days). XRP has been the more volatile of the two, at 65% annualised against MND's 40%.

Correlation: 0.34

MoundMND

$0.019816

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $3
Volatility (ann.): 40%

XRPXRP

$1.3042

24h: +1.45%
Market cap: $82.55B
Volume 24h: $2.70B
Volatility (ann.): 65%

MND 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% XRP

Performance

MNDXRP

7 days-4.60%-4.10%XRP
30 days-8.93%-16.04%MND
90 days—+20.18%—
1 year—-44.72%—

Correlation

0.34over 25 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	MND	XRP
Max drawdown (400d)	-11.6%	-67.3%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.22	0.29
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+41.9%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-47.3%

Relative strength over 90 days: MND outperformed XRP by 8.8% — measured on the MND/XRP ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Mound →XRP →