BTC$76,350.00▼ 5.41%ETH$2,262.66▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$693.49▼ 3.66%XRP$1.24▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.84▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3179▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,245.32▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.60▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0723▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.80▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1839▼ 6.72%BCH$276.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1544▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.69▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.89▼ 10.68%LTC$52.40▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.37▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9987▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8561▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,093.81▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0680▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.58▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$220.30▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,350.00▼ 5.41%ETH$2,262.66▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$693.49▼ 3.66%XRP$1.24▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.84▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3179▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,245.32▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.60▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0723▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.80▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1839▼ 6.72%BCH$276.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1544▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.69▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.89▼ 10.68%LTC$52.40▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.37▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9987▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8561▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,093.81▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0680▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.58▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$220.30▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

Naka Go vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 1964.7× the size of Naka Go (NAKA) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.28 across 184 shared trading days). NAKA has been the more volatile of the two, at 133% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.28
Size ratio
1 : 1964.7
Naka GoNAKA

$8.317e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$83,172
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
133%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.164000

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
NAKA 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% WIF

Performance

NAKAWIF

  1. 7 days-23.27%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-42.51%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days-46.05%+21.70%WIF
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.28over 184 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5790d: 0.341y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricNAKAWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-64.9%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.400.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed NAKA by 28.7% — measured on the NAKA/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.