BTC$76,034.90▼ 5.29%ETH$2,250.94▼ 7.20%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$690.95▼ 3.59%XRP$1.23▼ 5.48%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.34▼ 6.29%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.68%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.61%ZEC$1,238.47▼ 4.32%HYPE$78.26▼ 7.36%XMR$118.70▼ 3.92%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.29%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$73.19▼ 5.84%LEO$9.32▼ 0.02%LINK$10.76▼ 6.13%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.64%BCH$274.10▼ 2.40%XLM$0.1537▼ 7.71%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.46%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006086▼ 0.83%UNI$6.84▼ 9.89%LTC$52.23▼ 6.93%CC$0.0976▲ 0.11%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.41%USD1$0.9988▼ 0.12%SUI$0.8535▼ 8.39%XAUT$4,088.40▲ 0.96%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.29%HBAR$0.0678▼ 6.24%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%QNT$190.07▼ 6.89%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%TAO$219.50▼ 6.40%CRO$0.0492▼ 4.68%BTC$76,034.90▼ 5.29%ETH$2,250.94▼ 7.20%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$690.95▼ 3.59%XRP$1.23▼ 5.48%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.34▼ 6.29%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.68%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.61%ZEC$1,238.47▼ 4.32%HYPE$78.26▼ 7.36%XMR$118.70▼ 3.92%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.29%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$73.19▼ 5.84%LEO$9.32▼ 0.02%LINK$10.76▼ 6.13%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.64%BCH$274.10▼ 2.40%XLM$0.1537▼ 7.71%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.46%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006086▼ 0.83%UNI$6.84▼ 9.89%LTC$52.23▼ 6.93%CC$0.0976▲ 0.11%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.41%USD1$0.9988▼ 0.12%SUI$0.8535▼ 8.39%XAUT$4,088.40▲ 0.96%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.29%HBAR$0.0678▼ 6.24%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%QNT$190.07▼ 6.89%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%TAO$219.50▼ 6.40%CRO$0.0492▼ 4.68%

National Trust Fund System vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 4667.5× the size of National Trust Fund System (NTFS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.14 across 34 shared trading days). NTFS has been the more volatile of the two, at 158% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
-0.14
Size ratio
1 : 4667.5
National Trust Fund SystemNTFS

$3.502e-5

24h
+5.20%
Market cap
$35,015
Volume 24h
$327
Volatility (ann.)
158%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.163800

24h
-5.87%
Market cap
$163.43M
Volume 24h
$31.51M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
NTFS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

NTFSWIF

  1. 7 days-36.12%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-25.90%-32.13%NTFS
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.14over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricNTFSWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-36.6%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.170.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: NTFS outperformed WIF by 7.7% — measured on the NTFS/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.