BTC$75,949.47▼ 5.30%ETH$2,234.74▼ 7.64%USDT$0.9989▼ 0.04%BNB$689.43▼ 3.79%XRP$1.22▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.14▼ 4.88%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.44%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.51%ZEC$1,261.35▼ 2.16%HYPE$78.00▼ 5.17%XMR$118.70▼ 3.47%DOGE$0.0721▼ 5.77%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$72.98▼ 5.92%LEO$9.32▼ 0.22%LINK$10.73▼ 6.18%ADA$0.1823▼ 6.78%BCH$273.10▼ 2.93%XLM$0.1543▼ 7.03%NEAR$3.71▼ 7.48%USDE$1.00▼ 0.10%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%RAIN$0.005929▼ 0.45%UNI$6.85▼ 9.97%LTC$52.14▼ 6.87%CC$0.0973▼ 0.73%AVAX$8.30▼ 4.70%USD1$0.9997▼ 0.02%SUI$0.8502▼ 7.45%XAUT$4,076.31▲ 0.66%GRAM$1.12▼ 5.37%HBAR$0.0679▼ 5.54%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%QNT$189.84▼ 5.99%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.64%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%TAO$218.30▼ 6.42%CRO$0.0491▼ 4.84%BTC$75,949.47▼ 5.30%ETH$2,234.74▼ 7.64%USDT$0.9989▼ 0.04%BNB$689.43▼ 3.79%XRP$1.22▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.14▼ 4.88%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.44%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.51%ZEC$1,261.35▼ 2.16%HYPE$78.00▼ 5.17%XMR$118.70▼ 3.47%DOGE$0.0721▼ 5.77%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$72.98▼ 5.92%LEO$9.32▼ 0.22%LINK$10.73▼ 6.18%ADA$0.1823▼ 6.78%BCH$273.10▼ 2.93%XLM$0.1543▼ 7.03%NEAR$3.71▼ 7.48%USDE$1.00▼ 0.10%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%RAIN$0.005929▼ 0.45%UNI$6.85▼ 9.97%LTC$52.14▼ 6.87%CC$0.0973▼ 0.73%AVAX$8.30▼ 4.70%USD1$0.9997▼ 0.02%SUI$0.8502▼ 7.45%XAUT$4,076.31▲ 0.66%GRAM$1.12▼ 5.37%HBAR$0.0679▼ 5.54%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%QNT$189.84▼ 5.99%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.64%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%TAO$218.30▼ 6.42%CRO$0.0491▼ 4.84%

NBM Lumite vs The Sandbox

The Sandbox (SAND) is 6672.1× the size of NBM Lumite (NBMLUM) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.41 across 170 shared trading days). NBMLUM has been the more volatile of the two, at 120% annualised against SAND's 103%.

Correlation
0.41
Size ratio
1 : 6672.1
NBM LumiteNBMLUM

$1.912e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$18,885
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
120%
The SandboxSAND

$0.043050

24h
-5.88%
Market cap
$126.00M
Volume 24h
$40.20M
Volatility (ann.)
103%
NBMLUM 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% SAND

Performance

NBMLUMSAND

  1. 7 days+14.32%-4.87%NBMLUM
  2. 30 days+29.20%-35.02%NBMLUM
  3. 90 days+14.50%+10.31%NBMLUM
  4. 1 year—-73.92%—

Correlation

0.41over 170 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1590d: 0.301y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricNBMLUMSAND
Max drawdown (400d)-84.5%-88.4%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.120.07
Best 30 days (past year)—+94.1%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-48.8%

Relative strength over 90 days: NBMLUM outperformed SAND by 30.3% — measured on the NBMLUM/SAND ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.