BTC$76,006.01▼ 5.84%ETH$2,235.30▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$689.18▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.28▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,278.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$77.05▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0711▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.68▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1808▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1527▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.82▼ 11.13%LTC$51.62▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.16▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9992▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8395▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,076.32▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0675▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.50▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%BTC$76,006.01▼ 5.84%ETH$2,235.30▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$689.18▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.28▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,278.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$77.05▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0711▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.68▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1808▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1527▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.82▼ 11.13%LTC$51.62▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.16▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9992▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8395▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,076.32▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0675▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.50▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%

New Ancient DNA Cloned Wolf vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 7643.5× the size of New Ancient DNA Cloned Wolf (REMUS) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.13 across 32 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against REMUS's 79%.

Correlation
0.13
Size ratio
1 : 7643.5
New Ancient DNA Cloned WolfREMUS

$2.104e-5

24h
+4.18%
Market cap
$21,019
Volume 24h
$943
Volatility (ann.)
79%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.161100

24h
-6.07%
Market cap
$160.66M
Volume 24h
$30.99M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
REMUS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

REMUSWIF

  1. 7 days-2.33%-7.39%REMUS
  2. 30 days-28.90%-32.13%REMUS
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.13over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricREMUSWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-34.0%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.330.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: REMUS outperformed WIF by 7.5% — measured on the REMUS/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.