BTC$79,751.59▲ 1.81%ETH$2,397.13▲ 3.42%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$711.68▲ 1.68%XRP$1.31▲ 2.11%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$95.58▲ 2.82%TRX$0.3185▼ 0.18%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,303.19▲ 1.37%HYPE$82.00▼ 3.35%XMR$118.70▼ 0.50%DOGE$0.0761▲ 1.86%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$76.90▲ 2.35%LINK$11.47▲ 3.10%LEO$9.35▲ 0.29%ADA$0.1961▲ 2.93%XLM$0.1646▲ 1.03%BCH$289.60▲ 5.35%NEAR$3.95▼ 1.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.06%UNI$7.33▼ 0.18%LTC$55.31▲ 1.18%RAIN$0.005889▼ 3.73%CC$0.1002▲ 2.11%AVAX$8.71▼ 0.04%SUI$0.9153▲ 1.13%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,107.41▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.14▼ 2.73%HBAR$0.0718▲ 1.58%QNT$201.27▲ 1.44%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.62%TAO$232.10▲ 1.86%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0516▲ 1.20%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%BTC$79,751.59▲ 1.81%ETH$2,397.13▲ 3.42%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$711.68▲ 1.68%XRP$1.31▲ 2.11%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$95.58▲ 2.82%TRX$0.3185▼ 0.18%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,303.19▲ 1.37%HYPE$82.00▼ 3.35%XMR$118.70▼ 0.50%DOGE$0.0761▲ 1.86%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$76.90▲ 2.35%LINK$11.47▲ 3.10%LEO$9.35▲ 0.29%ADA$0.1961▲ 2.93%XLM$0.1646▲ 1.03%BCH$289.60▲ 5.35%NEAR$3.95▼ 1.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.06%UNI$7.33▼ 0.18%LTC$55.31▲ 1.18%RAIN$0.005889▼ 3.73%CC$0.1002▲ 2.11%AVAX$8.71▼ 0.04%SUI$0.9153▲ 1.13%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,107.41▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.14▼ 2.73%HBAR$0.0718▲ 1.58%QNT$201.27▲ 1.44%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.62%TAO$232.10▲ 1.86%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0516▲ 1.20%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%

Nietzschean Brown Bear vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 29311.2× the size of Nietzschean Brown Bear (BEAR) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely in opposite directions (correlation -0.35 across 23 shared trading days). BEAR has been the more volatile of the two, at 126% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
-0.35
Size ratio
1 : 29311.2
Nietzschean Brown BearBEAR

$5.820e-6

24h
+4.07%
Market cap
$5,817
Volume 24h
$6
Volatility (ann.)
126%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.171100

24h
-1.61%
Market cap
$170.50M
Volume 24h
$28.96M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
BEAR 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BEARWIF

  1. 7 days-12.50%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days—-32.13%—
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.35over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBEARWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-26.8%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.190.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: BEAR outperformed WIF by 12.1% — measured on the BEAR/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.