BTC$78,412.45▲ 1.15%ETH$2,318.61▲ 1.43%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.03%BNB$699.91▼ 0.27%XRP$1.28▼ 0.30%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$92.75▼ 0.46%TRX$0.3192▼ 0.86%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.29%ZEC$1,287.72▲ 6.13%HYPE$84.93▼ 0.40%XMR$118.70▲ 2.61%DOGE$0.0748▼ 0.86%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$75.10▲ 1.02%LEO$9.32▲ 0.61%LINK$11.13▼ 1.09%ADA$0.1899▼ 0.62%XLM$0.1629▼ 2.12%BCH$273.90▼ 1.30%NEAR$4.02▲ 2.33%USDE$1.00▼ 0.02%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%UNI$7.35▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.006137▼ 2.43%LTC$54.63▼ 0.27%CC$0.0981▲ 0.48%AVAX$8.68▲ 0.15%USD1$0.9998▲ 0.06%SUI$0.9034▲ 0.85%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.36%XAUT$4,029.35▲ 2.63%HBAR$0.0706▲ 0.27%QNT$197.65▼ 0.68%USDG$1.0000▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.42%PYUSD$0.9998▲ 0.00%TAO$227.90▲ 0.11%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%CRO$0.0509▲ 0.84%BTC$78,412.45▲ 1.15%ETH$2,318.61▲ 1.43%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.03%BNB$699.91▼ 0.27%XRP$1.28▼ 0.30%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$92.75▼ 0.46%TRX$0.3192▼ 0.86%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.29%ZEC$1,287.72▲ 6.13%HYPE$84.93▼ 0.40%XMR$118.70▲ 2.61%DOGE$0.0748▼ 0.86%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$75.10▲ 1.02%LEO$9.32▲ 0.61%LINK$11.13▼ 1.09%ADA$0.1899▼ 0.62%XLM$0.1629▼ 2.12%BCH$273.90▼ 1.30%NEAR$4.02▲ 2.33%USDE$1.00▼ 0.02%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%UNI$7.35▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.006137▼ 2.43%LTC$54.63▼ 0.27%CC$0.0981▲ 0.48%AVAX$8.68▲ 0.15%USD1$0.9998▲ 0.06%SUI$0.9034▲ 0.85%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.36%XAUT$4,029.35▲ 2.63%HBAR$0.0706▲ 0.27%QNT$197.65▼ 0.68%USDG$1.0000▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.42%PYUSD$0.9998▲ 0.00%TAO$227.90▲ 0.11%RLUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%CRO$0.0509▲ 0.84%

Nobody Sausage vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 539.2× the size of Nobody Sausage (NOBODY) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.35 across 38 shared trading days). NOBODY has been the more volatile of the two, at 243% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.35
Size ratio
1 : 539.2
Nobody SausageNOBODY

$0.000343

24h
+0.31%
Market cap
$321,265
Volume 24h
$390
Volatility (ann.)
243%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.174100

24h
+0.22%
Market cap
$173.23M
Volume 24h
$24.65M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
NOBODY 0.2%Share of the two combined market caps99.8% WIF

Performance

NOBODYWIF

  1. 7 days-33.28%-4.50%WIF
  2. 30 days-74.25%-32.23%WIF
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.35over 38 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricNOBODYWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-80.6%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.310.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed NOBODY by 72.0% — measured on the NOBODY/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.